Sports teams in North America have long used Indigenous names, symbols, and imagery in their branding. While once seen as a tribute, these depictions are now criticized for perpetuating stereotypes and disrespecting Indigenous cultures. Over 1,500 Native-led organizations and 115 professional groups have called for their removal, citing psychological harm and misrepresentation. Research shows these images negatively impact Indigenous youth’s self-esteem and reinforce stereotypes among non-Native audiences.
Recent changes, like the Washington NFL team’s rebrand to "Commanders" and Cleveland MLB’s shift to "Guardians", highlight progress. States like New York and California have also passed laws requiring schools to eliminate Indigenous-themed mascots. Teams are encouraged to replace such imagery with designs inspired by local heritage or community values, consulting with stakeholders for respectful transitions. Removing these harmful symbols fosters better understanding and unity.
History of Indigenous Imagery in Sports Branding
How Indigenous-Themed Mascots and Logos Started
The use of Indigenous imagery in American sports dates back to the early 20th century, when teams sought symbols that represented qualities like bravery, strength, and a fighting spirit. These decisions were made without consulting Indigenous communities. Instead, teams assumed such imagery would inspire players and fans by evoking characteristics like courage and resilience. Unfortunately, these portrayals were based on stereotypes rather than authentic traditions or meaningful collaboration.
Teams such as the Cleveland Indians, Washington Redskins, and Chicago Blackhawks embraced Native American imagery to project valor. However, these depictions leaned heavily on caricatured portrayals, reflecting a broader American trend of using Native American symbols in ways that were often inaccurate and reductive. While many teams claimed they were "honoring" Native Americans, their actions were rooted in stereotypes rather than genuine efforts to engage with Indigenous perspectives. This pattern of appropriation laid the groundwork for the growing opposition seen today.
Current Use and Growing Opposition
Despite years of criticism, Indigenous imagery is still widely used in American and Canadian sports, particularly among high schools and amateur teams. Over 1,500 Native organizations have called for a ban on all Native imagery, names, and cultural appropriation in sports. In addition, more than 115 professional groups tied to civil rights, education, athletics, and science have passed resolutions opposing the use of Native American names and symbols by non-Native teams. Recently, legislative efforts in several states have pushed for change.
Some teams have already taken steps to move away from Indigenous-themed branding. For example, the Golden State Warriors stopped using Native American imagery in 1971, and in 2021, the Edmonton CFL team rebranded from "Eskimos" to "Elks" after consulting Inuit organizations. That said, Indigenous-themed mascots and logos are still prevalent, especially at the high school and amateur levels, even as professional teams have begun to rebrand.
This debate is part of a larger conversation about race, identity, and tradition in the United States. Research in social sciences has repeatedly shown that such imagery reinforces harmful stereotypes and negatively impacts both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities. This historical backdrop underscores recent studies examining the psychological and cultural consequences of using Indigenous imagery in sports.
Imagining the Indian: De-Mascoting Native Americans in Sports
Research Findings: Effects on Indigenous Communities
Recent research sheds light on the harmful impact of Indigenous-themed logos, quantifying their effects on the mental health and cultural representation of Native American communities. These studies highlight how such imagery damages self-worth and cultural identity, particularly among Indigenous youth.
Mental Health Effects on Indigenous Youth
Exposure to mascots and logos depicting Indigenous themes has been shown to lower self-esteem, weaken feelings of community belonging, and increase stress and depression among Native youth. When children see their cultural identity reduced to stereotypes or caricatures, it erodes their ability to develop a confident and genuine sense of self.
The broader mental health picture for Indigenous communities is troubling. Native youth face disproportionately high suicide rates and poorer overall health outcomes, issues that experts partly attribute to the enduring effects of stereotyping and cultural disrespect. Research links the use of Indigenous imagery in sports to increased psychological distress and negative mental health outcomes.
Encouragingly, studies indicate that removing these harmful images can lead to positive changes. The Association on American Indian Affairs highlights evidence showing that mascot changes can promote healing and improve well-being within Indigenous communities. These findings emphasize the urgent need to address the psychological harm caused by such representations.
Stereotyping and Misrepresentation Issues
Indigenous-themed logos also fuel widespread misrepresentation. They often rely on caricatures, war cries, or headdresses, which fail to reflect the rich diversity and reality of Indigenous cultures, instead fostering misunderstanding and prejudice.
For example, the Chi-Nations Youth Council has criticized the Chicago Blackhawks logo as a symbol of imperialism and genocide. Indigenous groups frequently view these images not as benign symbols but as harmful representations that perpetuate historical trauma.
Additionally, when sports teams use oversimplified or inaccurate cultural symbols, they reinforce false associations between Native Americans and specific traits or behaviors. A 2020 review of social science research found that Indigenous-themed mascots and logos consistently produce negative effects, including psychological harm to Native American students and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes among non-Native individuals.
Effects on Non-Native Audiences
Beyond the documented harm to Indigenous communities, these images also influence how non-Native individuals perceive Indigenous peoples. Research shows that Indigenous-themed mascots and logos play a significant role in shaping the attitudes and behaviors of millions of Americans, often reinforcing stereotypes and misconceptions.
How Stereotypes Get Reinforced
Mascots and logos that draw on Indigenous themes perpetuate ethnic stereotypes among non-Native audiences, even when the imagery appears neutral or well-intentioned. These visuals reduce Indigenous peoples to overly simplistic caricatures and create false associations, regardless of any claims of honoring them. A 2020 review of social science research found that Native American mascots and imagery consistently produce negative effects, actively reinforcing biases and prejudices.
The issue extends into fan behavior at sporting events, where Indigenous-themed branding often prompts actions like wearing headdresses, painting faces, or performing mock "war chants." Such actions trivialize Indigenous cultures and reinforce harmful stereotypes, creating environments that can feel disrespectful or even hostile for both Native and non-Native individuals.
Impact on Education and Public Understanding
Indigenous mascots and logos also undermine efforts to educate the public about Indigenous cultures. When these images dominate mainstream perspectives, they replace authentic understanding with caricatured and misinformed depictions. In schools, their presence disrupts the learning environment, perpetuating stereotypes and limiting opportunities for accurate education about Indigenous histories and cultures. This can lead to long-lasting misconceptions that hinder efforts to foster inclusive and accurate curricula.
The widespread opposition from professional organizations highlights the educational damage caused by these images. Over 115 groups, including the American Psychological Association, have issued resolutions condemning the use of Native American names and symbols by non-Native sports teams, citing the stereotypes and misunderstandings they promote. Recent legislative actions further emphasize the recognition of these harms within educational and broader social contexts.
Positive Changes Through Rebranding
Positive outcomes have emerged when teams move away from Indigenous imagery. For instance, after the Washington Football Team and Cleveland Guardians rebranded, studies and community feedback revealed increased awareness and dialogue about issues affecting Indigenous peoples. These changes also led to greater sensitivity and a noticeable reduction in overtly stereotypical behaviors among fans during games.
For teams seeking to make similar changes, partnering with companies like Wooter Apparel can provide an opportunity to create logos and uniforms that reflect team values without perpetuating harmful stereotypes. These efforts not only respect cultural diversity but also encourage ethical branding that unites communities rather than dividing them through cultural appropriation.
sbb-itb-4d95ad3
Case Studies: Teams That Changed from Indigenous Imagery
Several professional sports teams have moved away from Indigenous-themed branding, highlighting both the challenges and benefits of rebranding. These examples provide valuable insights into how organizations can approach such transitions effectively.
Major Examples of Team Rebranding
Decisions to rebrand often stem from research on the harmful effects of certain imagery. One of the most notable examples is the Washington Commanders. Formerly known as the Redskins, the team faced growing pressure from Indigenous advocacy groups, such as the National Congress of American Indians, and corporate sponsors. In response, they officially rebranded as the Washington Commanders in 2022.
Similarly, the Cleveland Guardians underwent a significant transformation. The MLB team retired its controversial "Chief Wahoo" logo in 2018. After gathering public input, they adopted the Guardians name in 2021. This gradual rebranding approach helped ensure a smoother transition while maintaining fan loyalty.
Outside the United States, the Edmonton Elks of the Canadian Football League also embraced change. In 2021, they replaced the Eskimos name after consultations with Indigenous leaders who had long criticized the term.
| Team | Old Name/Logo | New Identity | Year Changed | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington NFL | Redskins | Commanders | 2022 | Sponsor pressure, advocacy |
| Cleveland MLB | Indians/Chief Wahoo | Guardians | 2018–2021 | Community input, advocacy groups |
| Edmonton CFL | Eskimos | Elks | 2021 | Indigenous leader consultation |
What Teams Learned from Making Changes
These rebranding efforts revealed several important lessons. Early and meaningful engagement with Indigenous communities proved to be the most critical factor. Teams that prioritized consultation with affected groups experienced smoother transitions and stronger public support. Transparent communication throughout the process also helped reduce resistance and preserve brand loyalty.
A phased approach to rebranding – starting with digital updates and communications before rolling out new uniforms, merchandise, and signage – helped teams manage costs and logistical hurdles. Many organizations reported improved relationships with Indigenous communities, positive media coverage, and increased backing from sponsors and advocacy groups. Early consultation and collaboration with these stakeholders played a key role in achieving these outcomes.
Research from social sciences further supported these changes, showing the negative psychological effects of Indigenous mascots on both Native and non-Native individuals. This evidence bolstered the case for rebranding and underscored the importance of cultural sensitivity.
In some cases, partnerships with custom apparel providers, such as Wooter Apparel, helped streamline the transition. Teams were able to create new uniforms and merchandise that reflected their updated identities while maintaining high performance standards and team cohesion.
Ultimately, successful rebranding required genuine community involvement, clear communication, gradual implementation, and educational efforts to emphasize the importance of respecting cultural identities. These examples illustrate how thoughtful, community-driven branding can lead to positive outcomes for both teams and the broader public.
Respectful Branding: Alternatives to Indigenous Imagery
For teams moving away from Indigenous imagery, adopting designs that reflect local heritage and community values offers a meaningful path forward. This transition requires careful attention to design principles that prioritize respect and originality.
Guidelines for Respectful Logo Design
A respectful rebranding process begins with understanding what to avoid. Teams should steer clear of any imagery, symbols, or names tied to Indigenous cultures, traditions, or stereotypes. This includes avoiding caricatures, sacred symbols, or elements that mock or misrepresent these cultures.
Organizations like the American Psychological Association, alongside prominent Indigenous groups, have voiced strong opposition to using Indigenous-themed names and imagery. They highlight the psychological harm and reinforcement of stereotypes such practices can cause. Instead, teams should focus on creating branding that reflects their own identity. Drawing inspiration from local geography, wildlife, or historical milestones unrelated to marginalized cultures can lead to fresh and meaningful designs. For instance, the Golden State Warriors successfully replaced Indigenous imagery with a bridge that symbolizes their local identity.
Community involvement plays a key role in this process. Consulting with local stakeholders and adhering to recent legislative requirements, such as New York’s 2023 mandate for teams to rebrand by 2025, ensures a smoother transition while addressing potential concerns early on. By celebrating their own heritage and avoiding symbols from cultures outside their origins, teams can create designs that resonate with fans and minimize controversy.
Beyond following these guidelines, teams can explore custom design solutions to bring their new vision to life.
Custom Branding Solutions
To achieve respectful and original branding, teams are increasingly turning to professional designers. Custom apparel specialists provide tailored solutions that align with team values while maintaining cultural sensitivity.
Wooter Apparel is one such provider, offering end-to-end custom design services. They help teams craft unique logos and uniforms without relying on Indigenous imagery. Their process emphasizes creativity, quality, and respect for cultural boundaries. Teams can explore free custom design options and choose from a variety of products, including jerseys, shorts, warm-up gear, and accessories for different sports.
Rather than borrowing elements from other cultures, teams can collaborate with designers to develop mascots inspired by local wildlife, geographic landmarks, or abstract concepts that embody teamwork and sportsmanship. For example, a mascot could symbolize a regional animal, a nearby mountain range, or an idea like unity or perseverance.
Fully sublimated designs are another key feature, offering vibrant and long-lasting prints that maintain a professional appearance throughout the season. This ensures that teams’ new branding remains visually striking while aligning with their fresh identity.
Rebranding doesn’t have to break the bank, either. Many custom design services include consultations to guide teams toward appropriate imagery, helping them avoid potential cultural sensitivity issues while creating compelling visual identities. By partnering with experienced designers, teams can ensure a smooth transition to a new brand that celebrates their unique story.
Successful branding alternatives often draw from local landmarks, wildlife, or shared community values. Whether it’s a design inspired by a nearby river, a regional animal, or an abstract representation of strength and unity, these approaches provide meaningful options that avoid cultural appropriation.
The push for original and respectful branding reflects a broader commitment to inclusivity and cultural awareness in sports. Teams that embrace this approach often find stronger community support and alignment with modern values of respect and diversity.
Conclusion: Moving Toward Respectful Team Branding
Research highlights the serious harm caused by Indigenous imagery in team logos, with over 115 professional organizations and 1,500 Native groups advocating for a complete ban.
Studies consistently connect Indigenous-themed mascots to psychological harm and damaging stereotypes. This has led respected organizations like the American Psychological Association and the National Congress of American Indians to push for their removal.
The legal landscape is shifting too. For instance, New York has required schools to phase out Indigenous-themed names and logos by 2025, while California implemented similar measures in 2024. These laws are setting the stage for meaningful rebranding efforts.
Examples like the Washington NFL team’s transition to the "Commanders" in 2022 and Cleveland’s retirement of the "Chief Wahoo" logo in 2018 show that teams can maintain strong identities without relying on misappropriated cultural imagery.
Teams have plenty of creative options for rebranding. They can draw inspiration from local wildlife, historical milestones, landmarks, or even abstract concepts like unity. Professional services, such as Wooter Apparel, offer expert assistance in developing new, respectful team identities that resonate with communities.
Choosing respectful branding fosters inclusivity and ensures all fans feel welcomed. This shift not only strengthens community ties but also aligns teams with modern values of diversity and mutual respect, proving that honoring culture and celebrating team spirit can go hand in hand.
FAQs
Why is the use of Indigenous imagery in sports team logos considered harmful?
The use of Indigenous imagery in sports team logos has long been criticized for perpetuating stereotypes and distorting the representation of Indigenous cultures. These portrayals often oversimplify and reduce vibrant, diverse traditions to exaggerated caricatures, which many Indigenous communities view as disrespectful and offensive.
Studies have also highlighted the harmful effects of such imagery. For Indigenous youth, it can undermine self-esteem and create identity struggles. At the same time, it reinforces harmful biases among non-Indigenous audiences, perpetuating misunderstandings about these cultures. A better approach is to design logos that reflect a team’s distinct identity without appropriating or misusing cultural symbols.
How can sports teams rebrand in a way that respects and includes Indigenous communities?
To approach rebranding with respect, sports teams should actively involve Indigenous communities in the conversation. Listening to their insights and concerns is key to understanding how to move forward thoughtfully. Collaborating with historians and cultural experts can also guide teams in creating imagery, names, or symbols that honor traditions rather than misrepresent or stereotype them.
Instead of using Indigenous-themed logos, teams might explore designs that express their core values and identity without borrowing cultural elements. For those considering a redesign, investing in high-quality custom uniforms and apparel offers a great opportunity to adopt a fresh and inclusive look – one that preserves team spirit while supporting peak performance.
What is the impact of removing Indigenous-themed mascots and logos on how non-Native people view Indigenous cultures?
Research has shown that getting rid of Indigenous-themed mascots and logos can play a role in breaking down harmful stereotypes and encouraging a more accurate view of Indigenous cultures. These mascots often rely on outdated or offensive images that fuel misconceptions and show a lack of respect.
By removing these depictions, organizations can move toward creating a more inclusive and respectful environment for Indigenous communities. Today, many teams and brands are looking into ethical options that honor diversity without misusing cultural symbols.